| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Nintendo is not a top tier game developer. Not by a long shot... |
| LockeMonster 06/25/18 5:21:54 PM #175: | CM_Ponch posted... TC isn't complaining about any of this though. His argument is that Nintendo isn't a top developer because they don't have giant scripts and paid actors to do voices. That and the other things is exactly what I'm talking about. CM_Ponch posted... You can claim a poor online holds them back, but how does it hold back Botw or Odyssey? The Nintendo games that require online implementat it about as much as they need to. Obviously not every game depends on online, so it's not referring to every game. Also, while Odyssey is perfectly fine, there's tons of things that BotW could have used like good dungeon and boss designs and story, especially in such a grand experience. Everything else could have remained and if the things I mentioned were added properly, it would only make it better. CM_Ponch posted... As for graphics, yeah the game could look "prettier", but that's barely holding a game back Room for improvement =/= holding back. CM_Ponch posted... Do you really look at Botw, Odyssey, or Splatoon and think they need to look better? With BotW, yes. There's lots of issues of fuzziness and other things in the game and improved graphics would only help, not hinder. CM_Ponch posted... Nintendo has weaker hardware but it's usually done for a gimmick which Nintendo then pushes to its limit. Yes, I touched on this point before. Not every game necessarily has to meet all the things I've mentioned. CM_Ponch posted... What are examples of Nintendo's "cheapness" holding a game back? We're not talking being held back, which explains why you guys sound so anal over this. It would only help. It's not being held back. It's simply leaving room for improvement. --- "Scranton is great, but New York is like Scranton on acid. No, on speed. Nah. On steroids." FC: 3282-3258-0224 ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |