LogFAQs > #903947065

LockeMonster posted...

LinkPizza posted...

I have to agree with Scottydoesntno on this one. I would have to go over all the post again to make sure. But I did read a bunch of he first ones again. The question that he(and others) asked was how does being cheap affect the games. The only answer they got was the thing about the charger a couple different times. And the other person saying that the company was cheap. But it is true they never said how it affected the games specifically. Which was the question asked. Maybe he did in a later post, but I dont remember ever seeing it. As I said, I would have to go back to check again, though. But I cant while Im at work...

So... You just made this long post without actually double checking what I said?

I explained through several posts that you should go back and read that they're a conservative company that doesn't spend where they don't have to. Things like a weak online infastructure, not including a basic accessory, having to abandon the Wii U, and various other things over the 30 years, are there to illustrate how the company is conservative. The links I posted also go into further detail with these things.

Now, this seems to be the hard part for you guys, so pay attention. The TC is talking about how the games, while having good gameplay, lack in other things. Now, if they're a conservative company that doesn't spend what they don't need to, this would explain the lack of these things. They've found a way to do it without the extra stuff. And that's fine. But that means there is room for improvement because gameplay does not have to be sacrificed for that.

The charger alone is not the argument I'm making, thus there's no list of specific examples to provide. I'm explaining how the company works and why things might be constrained because of that to end up how the TC is seeing it and how a different company philosophy would lead to different outputs.

I said I didnt go back and read everything. But I did say I read some. Also, I actually did read the post the first time through.

Anyway, I remember you talking about them being conservative. And I also remember other people talking about how all companies are conservative is some places and not in others. And its true. I dont think being conservative is some places in automatically being cheap. Its just being safe. Just because I dont buy every game as soon as they come out, Im not cheap. Im making sure I have money for the things I need.

I dont know anything about this charger, but its the one thing you keep mentioning. Its almost like you dont have many other examples, or else you would probably stop using that on every post...

Everybody sees games differently. You can say they lack whatever, but every games lacks something. And that can also change depending on the person. For me, I dont need an intricate story for something like Mario. Just say the bad guy does whatever, and let me go to a bunch of worlds and Mario my way though. As an example. For that, I dont see a huge story making it any better. It has enough...

Having a different company philosophy would basically mean theyre not Nintendo anymore. And people like their games. And they make good games. If you dont like them, dont play them. They make great games. And are pretty much top tier. It doesnt mean theyre the very best, though a good number of people will say they are. Every company does things different. Which is better that way. More variety in games. I dont need Nintendo to try to make Zelda and Mario look more realistic or to add super deep stories. Zelda can have a deep story, but I just play it for the gameplay. Also, they might not be as conservative as you think. They add and change stuff for sequels quite often. Like how Uncharted changed a little with each new entry, they do the same for their sequels.
---

Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.