LogFAQs > #903946795

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicNintendo is not a top tier game developer. Not by a long shot...
CM_Ponch
06/25/18 4:54:30 PM
#172:


LockeMonster posted...
Now, this seems to be the hard part for you guys, so pay attention. The TC is talking about how the games, while having good gameplay, lack in other things. Now, if they're a conservative company that doesn't spend what they don't need to, this would explain the lack of these things. They've found a way to do it without the extra stuff. And that's fine. But that means there is room for improvement because gameplay does not have to be sacrificed for that.

TC isn't complaining about any of this though. His argument is that Nintendo isn't a top developer because they don't have giant scripts and paid actors to do voices. You can claim a poor online holds them back, but how does it hold back Botw or Odyssey? The Nintendo games that require online implementat it about as much as they need to.
As for graphics, yeah the game could look "prettier", but that's barely holding a game back. Do you really look at Botw, Odyssey, or Splatoon and think they need to look better?
Nintendo has weaker hardware but it's usually done for a gimmick which Nintendo then pushes to its limit.
What are examples of Nintendo's "cheapness" holding a game back?
---
SW-8316-3213-4720
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1