That doesn't make any sense. People demanding an end to abortion aren't turning around and adopting all of those unwanted kids, so why should people that advocate for refugees allow them in their homes?
Because the people that advocate for refugees are generally the same ones that insist being anti-abortion creates an obligation to take in unwanted children. Yet look how keen they are to do the same with groups they want to support.
I'm not seeing the contradiction here. Being pro-refugee doesn't imply that you want them to live in either your or someone else's house. They'd be living in their own homes somewhere where in your country, state, or city. You'd still be living somewhere else on your own in your country, state, or city.
And being anti-abortion doesn't imply that you want to personally take care of the would-be abortion victims, any more than being anti-murder implies you want to personally take care of the would-be murder victims. They'd be living in their own home somewhere in your country, state or city. You'd still be living somewhere else on your own in your country, state or city.