LogFAQs > #903417327

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicThese parents being put on the hook for $132,000 were being negligent... right?
Bugmeat
06/17/18 1:53:47 AM
#23:


SirPikachu posted...
Yes, kid was 5 and unsupervised, and CLIMBED on to a work of art. It wouldn't be bad if all he did was accidentally run into it and made it fall over, but climbing on it is something he should have been taught to not do, and something that should have never happened

I definitely agree with this train of thought. It's not like it was a legit accident where the kid tripped, fell into exhibit and knocked it over. He stops, looks at it, starts grabbing on and trying to climb it. On top of that the mother was totally negligent in her parental responsibilities to keep her kids under control.
---
John Mellencamp said it best "Life goes on long after the thrill of living is gone."
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1