LogFAQs > #902449106

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Trump officials demand Mueller return thousands of emails II: No Take Backs!
Doctor Foxx 06/02/18 9:13:22 PM #13:	Zeus posted... And which unimportant coffee boys will turn out to be unimportant Diet Coke boys? #scandal #IfTheFingersDontReachYouMustImpeach Hey Zeus do you still believe these blatant lies Zeus posted... No, we knew that members had sat down and spoken with Russians immediately following the election and there was news that Kushner had run into a Russian banker of some sort while on business -- just like he runs into other bankers. However, if you want to talk about ACTUAL collusion, the Hillary campaign paid a man who went and solicited information directly from members of the Russian government. Zeus posted... So far the most damning evidence of collusion was that somebody from the Trump campaign met with a Russian ambassador on official business after Trump had won the election, something which his predecessors have always done. If you want evidence of anything, you've found strong evidence of a double-standard. Zeus posted... lolwut? If anything, his conduct has been less egregious than previous administrations. Clinton fired White House vendors -- including a travel agency -- and brought in family friends to replace them. GWB was accused of being elected based on nepotism. Obama sold ambassadorships to donors who never even visited the countries they were going to be assigned to. But sure, make shit up to undermine the presidency and advance your foreign masters' standing. Zeus posted... In general, the whole Russia conspiracy is laughable. It's like a stupider form of McCarthyism which, ironically enough, is being promoted by a politician named McCarthy. This has humorously enough included attempts to limit RT on the basis that it's a state-owned media outlet which has influence over the US public while, at the same time, no complaints were raised about the BBC which is pretty much in the same boat since it's also a state-owned media outlet which has influence over the US public. Granted, unlike RT, people actually pay attention to the BBC. Zeus posted... Because a long-standing friendship with a political candidate wouldn't influence him to make statements about that candidate's political opponent? And "controversial" is more than enough given the other facts. Zeus posted... Or are you just basing it on the assumption that he might have claimed a direct access to Putin which he never had which thereby constitutes an attempt to collude which never actually occurred and runs contrary to the central claims of the investigation? At this point, it's starting to look like people are just flinging as much shit as possible at a president they don't like so they can see what will stick. --- Never write off the Doctor! <cite>Doctor Foxx posted [p:902449106] in Trump offi... [t:76662791]...</cite> <quote><cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>And which unimportant coffee boys will turn out to be unimportant Diet Coke boys? #scandal #IfTheFingersDontReachYouMustImpeach</quote> Hey Zeus do you still believe these blatant lies <cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>No, we knew that members had sat down and spoken with Russians immediately following the election and there was news that Kushner had run into a Russian banker of some sort while on business -- just like he runs into other bankers. However, if you want to talk about ACTUAL collusion, the Hillary campaign paid a man who went and solicited information directly from members of the Russian government.</quote> <cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>So far the most damning evidence of collusion was that somebody from the Trump campaign met with a Russian ambassador on official business after Trump had won the election, something which his predecessors have always done. If you want evidence of anything, you've found strong evidence of a double-standard.</quote> <cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>lolwut? If anything, his conduct has been less egregious than previous administrations. Clinton fired White House vendors -- including a travel agency -- and brought in family friends to replace them. GWB was accused of being elected based on nepotism. Obama sold ambassadorships to donors who never even visited the countries they were going to be assigned to. But sure, make shit up to undermine the presidency and advance your foreign masters' standing. </quote> <cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>In general, the whole Russia conspiracy is laughable. It's like a stupider form of McCarthyism which, ironically enough, is being promoted by a politician named McCarthy. This has humorously enough included attempts to limit RT on the basis that it's a state-owned media outlet which has influence over the US public while, at the same time, no complaints were raised about the BBC which is pretty much in the same boat since it's also a state-owned media outlet which has influence over the US public. Granted, unlike RT, people actually pay attention to the BBC.</quote> <cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Because a long-standing friendship with a political candidate wouldn't influence him to make statements about that candidate's political opponent? And "controversial" is more than enough given the other facts.</quote> <cite>Zeus posted...</cite> <quote>Or are you just basing it on the assumption that he might have claimed a direct access to Putin which he never had which thereby constitutes an attempt to collude which never actually occurred and runs contrary to the central claims of the investigation? At this point, it's starting to look like people are just flinging as much shit as possible at a president they don't like so they can see what will stick.</quote> --- Never write off the Doctor!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1