MelzezDoor posted...Slip-N-Slide posted...
MelzezDoor posted...
Maybe because CE has a tendency to prematurely label people and subsequently bully them for it? Just maybe??
Pretty sure witch hunting is not allowed. Much less baseless witch hunting.
The topic I responded to was of a convicted sex offender who sexually abused two brothers and didn't deny it.
I specified in my post that only people capable of cold blooded violent murder, and rapists who willingly did it of their own accord, specifically child rapists immediately [redacted] once they commit the act of doing it. I never mentioned anyone specific, I only meant people who have been proved beyond a reasonable doubt as guilty and are truly what they are accused of are inherently [redacted].
Didn't realize that was an offensive stance to take that someone who chooses to do something like that of their own accord is immediately [redacted] and is only good for psychological profiling and preventing future crimes.
Didn't realize that was a bold stance to take.
"Didn't deny" is not enough especially for someone who is not directly involved. Besides, it's a behavioral thing. Like devolving AMA topics. Sensitive subjects like these are prone to witch hunting and thus merits harsher mods. It's about setting a precedent. Imagine if this kind of talk was allowed it'd be easy to egg people on and on and would inevitably be abused.
Conflict posted...
Don't use "witch hunting" if you don't know the context
TC was saying this about a poster's coworker. How you can "witch hunt" someone you have zero information about
Oh he was talking about a poster's coworker? I see. Yes, how can you witch hunt just from that? lmao
I wasn't talking about his co-workers specially or naming any specific person. The actual topic was about if you can rehabilitate major sex offenders.
In another post, that wasn't modded, I did say something bad about his co-worker when the TC said he sexually abused two kids who were brothers.
The moderated post had nothing to do with anyone specific. I simply stated there are a handful of actions, that once you willingly commit them maliciously, you're immediately [redacted] and have proven yourself both unable to be as well as undeserving of being a member of society again.
Cold blooded murder, rape, and especially child rape were 3 things I cited that I said in my opinion fall under that handful.
The post had nothing to do with his co-worker specifically, he was never mentioned at any point in the post or the TC's post in the topic I had quoted.
I'm just trying to see how insulting people who committed heinous, unforgivable, violent crimes against others is "offensive"
Here's another
bold stance: Adolf Hitler was subhuman garbage.
Am I going to get modded now for that
offensive statement? Is a mod going to tell me "declaring that Adolf Hitler wasn't human is offensive." over that?
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
