LogFAQs > #900045804

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicPolitics Containment Topic 169: Check Your (Attorney-Client) Privilege
Corrik
04/21/18 11:07:11 AM
#469:


Dancedreamer posted...
Corrik posted...
Are you trying to justify a position in which you should not be outraged if someone would threaten to shoot someone?


You mean like Ted Nugent and Dana Loesch do all the time?

If you don't have to show outrage at them, I don't see why I should be expected to show outrage at this professor I've never heard of before today. Maybe I should just pull out the conservative playbook and say she's a false flag paid protester by the Koch Brothers. Or just shout FAKE NEWS. Or say it wasn't really a threat and the context was 'misunderstood'.

Or maybe you did show outrage, and I missed it. In which case you could have simply said "I was outraged at those too!" But you didn't, so I'm taking it on your implication that you didn't.

Is this a lot of dancing around the issue to find a way to say you would support a threat to shoot someone?

I mean, you are all but saying you do, in a ton of words.
---
LoL ID = imajericho
XBL GT = Corrik
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1