LogFAQs > #896522790

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, Database 3 ( 02.21.2018-07.23.2018 ), DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicConservative politics topic 2: The sacred TRUTH Trumps all lies
StealThisSheen
02/21/18 7:29:55 PM
#326:


Mr Lasastryke posted...
it's almost like you think that pointing out how little we can trust the bible as a source is "cheating" or something, and that i should only be allowed to criticize the bible by pointing out flaws in the text itself. i get this line of thinking when we're talking about, say wikipedia - i always hate it when people go "LOL WIKIPEDIA" when trying to discredit an argument, when the vast majority of information on the site is actually demonstrably correct. but... the bible isn't wikipedia. i think it's perfectly valid for me to put tons of question marks besides pretty much every verse in the bible. i don't see what's "unfair" about it at all.


I'm saying why do you feel the desire to always have to attack it to begin with. Typically, people aren't actually arguing with you and going "Yes, you must believe this because X." They're going "Well, I believe X because" or "They believe Y because" and then you feel the need to go on this whole "NO FACTS" tirade which makes it look like you've got this agenda

You feel the need to somehow prove why people can't or shouldn't believe it
---
Seplito Nash, Smelling Like the Vault since 1996
Step FOUR! Get Paid!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1