LogFAQs > #894449671

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Margaret Thatcher on Income Inequality and Socialism
UnfairRepresent 01/20/18 5:49:12 PM #37:	Mal_Fet posted... UnfairRepresent posted... But that's not what happened. The poor didn't start earning more because the Rich earned more. The rich earned a lot more and the poor lost their jobs, homes, sometimes their lives, pensioners lost their pensions, industries collasped and healthcare services were stripped. Can you show that the poor in the UK were empirically worse off in 1990 than in 1979 without invoking their relative economic position to the rich? What do you mean "empirically" that doesn't include poverty, home-ownership, employment, pensions, benefits or healthcare which has been shown? Approval ratings of government? Well let's go ask the Scottish that.... --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg <cite>UnfairRepresent posted [p:894449671] in Margaret T... [t:76223940]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mal_Fet posted...</cite> <quote><cite>UnfairRepresent posted...</cite> <quote>But that's not what happened. The poor didn't start earning more because the Rich earned more. The rich earned a lot more and the poor lost their jobs, homes, sometimes their lives, pensioners lost their pensions, industries collasped and healthcare services were stripped.</quote> Can you show that the poor in the UK were empirically worse off in 1990 than in 1979 without invoking their relative economic position to the rich?</quote> What do you mean "empirically" that doesn't include poverty, home-ownership, employment, pensions, benefits or healthcare which has been shown? Approval ratings of government? Well let's go ask the Scottish that.... --- ^ Hey now that's completely unfair. https://imgtc.com/i/14JHfrt.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1