Topic List | Page List: 1 |
---|---|
Topic | Why do the history books try to demonize Stalin? |
streamofthesky 01/14/18 3:01:46 PM #27: | Yes, Stalin was also a moron. Russia's hilariously pathetic showing in the Winter War (a war of conquest 100% the fault of Russia) is usually cited as encouraging hitler to think Russia would be easy to defeat and effectively hastened the two going into conflict. Both were colossal idiots. They were charismatic and ruthlessly evil which helped them gain power, but shockingly...the tools that help one gain power aren't necessarily the best ones for using it wisely. shadowsword87 posted... streamofthesky posted...and that Russia's "heroics" weren't intentional but a "hoist by his own petard" moment where Stalin had allied w/ hitler out of convenience and was betrayed and caught by surprise. Them going into conflict wasn't surprising, and Stalin planned to attack Germany at some point, iirc. Just the timing of it, happening so soon, and hitler striking first caught Stalin by surprise. That's what I meant. Kyuubi4269 posted... streamofthesky posted...Britain wouldn't have been able to halt the nazi advance on the western and African fronts w/o the weapons being sent from the U.S. To be fair, the U.S. was trying to be coy and play semi-"neutral" and claim they're not involved in the war. Just selling arms for money like the good capitalists they were. If they straight up gave the British arms for free, that thin veneer would've dissolved quickly. It's still a bit messed up and in the end wasn't fooling anybody, but a lot of Americans at the time were isolationist, so FDR had to perform his little rhetorical dance. And yes, also aware that the Pearl Harbor attack was hardly "unprovoked," and it's a shame that part's seldom taught. ... Copied to Clipboard! |
Topic List | Page List: 1 |