LogFAQs > #893183663

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Is Peak TV killing TV?
scarletspeed7 12/31/17 2:27:28 PM #3:	Interesting that you're pitching it as a Big Eight, because at that point you'll be paying the same amount for a decent cable package now as for 8 Netflix-costing streaming services. And do you just go back to cable at that point? Can networks and cable unite and change the technology so that the convenience is there for them re-entice viewers back to TV? My biggest question is, what is the cost a content provider will pay for one viewer? Because that's the value that will determine where shows go from here. Rising costs, more shows, diluted viewer pool... it makes me wonder if Twin Peaks was a commercial success or not, for example. --- "Reading would be your friend." ~Dave Meltzer <cite>scarletspeed7 posted [p:893183663] in Is Peak TV... [t:76154926]...</cite> <quote>Interesting that you're pitching it as a Big Eight, because at that point you'll be paying the same amount for a decent cable package now as for 8 Netflix-costing streaming services. And do you just go back to cable at that point? Can networks and cable unite and change the technology so that the convenience is there for them re-entice viewers back to TV? My biggest question is, what is the cost a content provider will pay for one viewer? Because that's the value that will determine where shows go from here. Rising costs, more shows, diluted viewer pool... it makes me wonder if Twin Peaks was a commercial success or not, for example. --- "Reading would be your friend." ~Dave Meltzer</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1