LogFAQs > #892786258

Figured I would get this out of the way since the whole circumcision argument seems to revolve around looks.

I used to be avidly pro-circumcision and argued for it on CE not even that long ago, and like most people, "looks" was my main hangup.

The foreskin pulls back behind the glans (head) during erection. It also looks much smoother and colorful because the head isn't subjected to constant friction with clothing. It makes it much easier to masturbate as well (wow weapon, you mean leaving the natural male anatomy intact makes everything flow nicer? ) The only time the look of your dick matters is when it's erect so who gives a fuck if it looks like an earthworm/ballpoint click pen when flaccid?

The reason circumcision exists at all is because:

1. Ancient prudes wanted to inconvenience the act of masturbation
2. Ancient prudes didn't want to have to discuss penis anatomy with their sons when explaining genital hygiene
---

SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SIG SlG