LogFAQs > #891393604

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicIs it okay to kill civilians in war?
darkknight109
12/01/17 11:12:53 AM
#66:


RoboXgp89 posted...
do you know what war is?

I have some passing familiarity with it, yes.

RoboXgp89 posted...
we never got any unconditional surrender bargain they attacked us because they were jealous and racist you nitwit

Oh man. Do you really not know anything about WW2? If you think the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbour because "they were jealous", you really need to do some research on the post-WW1 settlement agreements, Japan during the inter-war years, and America's actions prior to entering WW2.

RoboXgp89 posted...
you don't say "I surrender, but..." in a war

Um, yes you do. Frequently. Suing for peace is one of the most common ways of ending bloodshed and is far more common than unconditional surrender.

RoboXgp89 posted...
idiot

This might have more weight if you knew how to capitalize properly. Or weren't seriously arguing that Japan started a war over jealousy.

Or, really, had a cogent argument at all. I still have no idea what you're actually trying to say with your posts.
---
Kill 1 man: You are a murderer. Kill 10 men: You are a monster.
Kill 100 men: You are a hero. Kill 10,000 men, you are a conqueror!
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1