LogFAQs > #891361754

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicIs it okay to kill civilians in war?
RoboXgp89
11/30/17 8:10:33 PM
#60:


Kyuubi4269 posted...
RoboXgp89 posted...
If Japan wanted to surrender they would have surrendered
Land war was incoming and they were on the brink of starvation
60k townspeople vs 60k soldiers and many more in starvation
you choose

nvm that we dropped the bomb twice

They were at war to claim land to keep their growing population afloat. Japan got its oil from the US but it wasn't enough so they took oil rich land. The US threatened to withdraw oil sales if they didn't stop expansion and since Japan couldn't get enough anyway, they forged ahead to claim energy independence.

They were in between a rock and a hard place, surrender wasn't an acceptable option when they weren't going to be any better off if they did swallow their pride.

Given usable terms they would have surrendered but that wasn't in the US's interest.


Japan invaded mainland china and all hell broke loose
that land was never their right to claim, nor where it's peoples ready to surrender to Japan
where the chinese and phillipines going to learn japanese? an isolationist nation? yeah ok...
---
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1