LogFAQs > #890570192

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Net neutrality wouldn't be in danger if people cared about it as much as...
Tmk 11/17/17 12:39:52 PM #38:	s0nicfan posted... So if you know that, then why aren't you "taking the problem seriously"? At that point, if you know what the real issue is, and you KNOW it'll negatively impact your already bad experience, then the ONLY reason for you to be less energized than you would otherwise be is, again, spite. There's zero other possible reason. I already said why like 3 times in this topic. You should listen more. ~~What I have to accept is so shitty it numbs my standards severely~~ What's happening here appears to be a total failure of empathy on your part. I'm not sure all the verbal handholding in the universe can fix that. Perhaps look at it this way: I came to satellite internet from cellular internet. Which, for reference, was much slower even than satellite, and had a 5GB cap. So, satellite internet was an upgrade, amazingly. And like I said, it's the best I've ever known, though I know it's utterly unacceptably bad. But I have to accept it. Having to accept something unthinkably bad in quality for most people, naturally does really messed up things to one's standards. Similarly, if someone with like, fiber optic internet, had to switch down to satellite, for even a year, they'd probably hate it even more than I do, because they have modern internet standards. It'd be harder to accept. If all else fails, just look inside yourself, and find how much you don't care about my situation or the fact it's been my situation for years and will continue to be and that satellite internet is BASICALLY a fraud and this is what millions in America have to use. You don't care, and most don't. And what I've been pointing out, is the dialogue used to try and get people to care about net neutrality, is aimed at people with modern internet, and modern internet standards, and so the language generally says things that like "wouldn't it be bad if this happened" but for someone with satellite internet, that already happened, always was, and is much worse, so NATURALLY it's going to come across worse to them. I am not explaining this again. --- I am snazzier, hot, hot rant. Warily slight as. Croak rush, OK? Weirder, almighty make out. ::) <cite>Tmk posted [p:890570192] in Net neutra... [t:76001225]...</cite> <quote><cite>s0nicfan posted...</cite> <quote>So if you know that, then why aren't you "taking the problem seriously"? At that point, if you know what the real issue is, and you KNOW it'll negatively impact your already bad experience, then the ONLY reason for you to be less energized than you would otherwise be is, again, spite. There's zero other possible reason.</quote> I already said why like 3 times in this topic. You should listen more. What I have to accept is so shitty it numbs my standards severely What's happening here appears to be a total failure of empathy on your part. I'm not sure all the verbal handholding in the universe can fix that. Perhaps look at it this way: I came to satellite internet from cellular internet. Which, for reference, was much slower even than satellite, and had a 5GB cap. So, satellite internet was an upgrade, amazingly. And like I said, it's the best I've ever known, though I know it's utterly unacceptably bad. But I have to accept it. Having to accept something unthinkably bad in quality for most people, naturally does really messed up things to one's standards. Similarly, if someone with like, fiber optic internet, had to switch down to satellite, for even a year, they'd probably hate it even more than I do, because they have modern internet standards. It'd be harder to accept. If all else fails, just look inside yourself, and find how much you don't care about my situation or the fact it's been my situation for years and will continue to be and that satellite internet is BASICALLY a fraud and this is what millions in America have to use. You don't care, and most don't. And what I've been pointing out, is the dialogue used to try and get people to care about net neutrality, is aimed at people with modern internet, and modern internet standards, and so the language generally says things that like "wouldn't it be bad if this happened" but for someone with satellite internet, that already happened, always was, and is much worse, so NATURALLY it's going to come across worse to them. I am not explaining this again. --- I am snazzier, hot, hot rant. Warily slight as. Croak rush, OK? Weirder, almighty make out. ::)</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1