LogFAQs > #890569716

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicNet neutrality wouldn't be in danger if people cared about it as much as...
Tmk
11/17/17 12:31:31 PM
#32:


Anarchy_Juiblex posted...
Pay to have them lay fiber. What the fuck do you want? Sympathy? You want geography and population densities to not matter in city planning and utilities?

Because telecommunication companies certainly could do no wrong, is that it? Dude I've heard stories of ONE SIDE of a street not getting service while the other did. It's arbitrary as fuck.

If electricity can be wired to a home, fucking internet should be too by now. It's 2017.

s0nicfan posted...
Net Neutrality is about WAY more than data caps, dude. Comcast already does data caps in about 30 states. Net Neutrality is about you on your shitty satellite link having certain web sites load twice as slow as they do currently because said sites didn't pay the fee to get on the "fast lane". Imagine your current service, but half the internet loads about half as fast. THAT'S the fight over net neutrality. Data caps aren't even in focus.

Oh I know. Which is why I'm pointing out how dumb what reddit did was. Framing it like that not only simplifies the issue, it's going to come across as obnoxious to everyone on satellite or cellular internet.
---
I am snazzier, hot, hot rant. Warily slight as.
Croak rush, OK? Weirder, almighty make out. ::)
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1