LogFAQs > #889613384

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	"The universe shouldn't exist", says Cern physicists
CircleOfManias 11/02/17 9:34:12 AM #71:	JE19426 posted... WindMouseHanpan posted... No one, just making it more obvious how ridiculous their claim is. Saying the universe should not exist, when you don't even fully understand everything about the universe to begin with, is silly. It's like saying "plants should not exist" just because we've never observed them eating something to stay alive (carnivorous plants aside), before we learned that they absorb nutrients from the ground and make energy through photosynthesis. We don't fully understand everything about dark matter, the universe, etc, so it's quite a leap to say it "shouldn't exist" when we don't actually know everything about what makes it tick to begin with. There is some element or property out there, probably many, that we have yet to discover, which would shed more light on things. So what your saying is that you never read the scientists statement. The media does this shit all the time. Oversimplifying a statement and taking it out of context to make it sound outrageous for clicks. The thing that was actually found is that the reason for the universe's existence is not related to some fundamental difference in the absolute values of the charges of particles and antiparticles. --- Sick liaisons raise this monumental mark The sun sets forever over Blackwater Park <cite>CircleOfManias posted [p:889613384] in "The ... [t:75911962]...</cite> <quote><cite>JE19426 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>WindMouseHanpan posted...</cite> <quote>No one, just making it more obvious how ridiculous their claim is. Saying the universe should not exist, when you don't even fully understand everything about the universe to begin with, is silly. It's like saying "plants should not exist" just because we've never observed them eating something to stay alive (carnivorous plants aside), before we learned that they absorb nutrients from the ground and make energy through photosynthesis. We don't fully understand everything about dark matter, the universe, etc, so it's quite a leap to say it "shouldn't exist" when we don't actually know everything about what makes it tick to begin with. There is some element or property out there, probably many, that we have yet to discover, which would shed more light on things. </quote> So what your saying is that you never read the scientists statement.</quote> The media does this shit all the time. Oversimplifying a statement and taking it out of context to make it sound outrageous for clicks. The thing that was actually found is that the reason for the universe's existence is not related to some fundamental difference in the absolute values of the charges of particles and antiparticles. --- Sick liaisons raise this monumental mark The sun sets forever over Blackwater Park</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1