LogFAQs > #888937248

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Hmm...I suppose we are the only developed life in our galaxy
DoctorVader 10/22/17 7:46:44 PM #55:	omgbread posted... DoctorVader posted... omgbread posted... What? We will almost certainly create this tech within the next 200ish years (max) No, there is zero indication to this and even a far greater chance humans would avoid something like replicators as Sagan put it. You don't seem to know what the words "almost certain" mean it seems. There's tons of factors here, yet you're guaranteeing things that have only shown up in sci-fi. You're starting to sound stupider and stupider with your posts. You're either trolling or think you're coming off as enlightened when you're really not just like @itachi15243 said. The basics of that tech exist now. The basics of most future tech exists now. So that's not a very strong argument that something like replicators that will be detectible in 400 billion star systems, is almost certain. Nor have your explained that these replicators are not here somewhere and that we just haven't been able to detect it. Again, the only thing certain here is that we don't know. Everything you're saying is based on human behavior and assumptions. Remove those and nothing changes in terms of the viability of life. To say otherwise doesn't make you intelligent. It makes you look stupid. --- It all just disappears, doesn't it? Everything you are, gone in a moment, like breath on a mirror. - The Doctor <cite>DoctorVader posted [p:888937248] in Hmm...I su... [t:75901251]...</cite> <quote><cite>omgbread posted...</cite> <quote><cite>DoctorVader posted...</cite> <quote><cite>omgbread posted...</cite> <quote>What? We will almost certainly create this tech within the next 200ish years (max)</quote> No, there is zero indication to this and even a far greater chance humans would avoid something like replicators as Sagan put it. You don't seem to know what the words "almost certain" mean it seems. There's tons of factors here, yet you're guaranteeing things that have only shown up in sci-fi. You're starting to sound stupider and stupider with your posts. You're either trolling or think you're coming off as enlightened when you're really not just like @itachi15243 said.</quote> The basics of that tech exist now.</quote> The basics of most future tech exists now. So that's not a very strong argument that something like replicators that will be detectible in 400 billion star systems, is almost certain. Nor have your explained that these replicators are not here somewhere and that we just haven't been able to detect it. Again, the only thing certain here is that we don't know. Everything you're saying is based on human behavior and assumptions. Remove those and nothing changes in terms of the viability of life. To say otherwise doesn't make you intelligent. It makes you look stupid. --- It all just disappears, doesn't it? Everything you are, gone in a moment, like breath on a mirror. - The Doctor</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1