LogFAQs > #888931361

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The argument against the 22nd amendment?!?
lilORANG 10/22/17 6:07:30 PM #9:	ChainedRedone posted... lilORANG posted... I think they're kinda dumb because 1) if people are willing to vote for someone, they should be able to vote for them and 2) like any job, being a politician requires experience to get good at, and there is benefit to having people in office for long periods of time because they know how shit works. But you'll lose Republican tradition over time. Not if the other party puts up someone who can win. If they can't, then why get rid of a popular leader? --- #FeelTheBern http://i.imgur.com/q5z4CUu.jpg http://i.imgur.com/6B9oFXh.jpg http://i.imgur.com/sy42Dlf.jpg <cite>lilORANG posted [p:888931361] in The argume... [t:75908152]...</cite> <quote><cite>ChainedRedone posted...</cite> <quote><cite>lilORANG posted...</cite> <quote>I think they're kinda dumb because 1) if people are willing to vote for someone, they should be able to vote for them and 2) like any job, being a politician requires experience to get good at, and there is benefit to having people in office for long periods of time because they know how shit works.</quote> But you'll lose Republican tradition over time.</quote> Not if the other party puts up someone who can win. If they can't, then why get rid of a popular leader? --- #FeelTheBern http://i.imgur.com/q5z4CUu.jpg http://i.imgur.com/6B9oFXh.jpg http://i.imgur.com/sy42Dlf.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1