LogFAQs > #888382301

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicIf gun owner peeps are scared of corrupt government tyranny...
pls
10/13/17 6:36:59 PM
#21:


Smashingpmkns posted...
2) US citizens having guns against the US military is still having "no chance"


The US military is comprised of US citizens. It's probable a large portion would not engage in warfare against private citizens. Not to mention that it's better than having no defense whatsoever. When you have no defense whatsoever, this happens:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/11/world/asia/rohingya-myanmar-atrocities.html

Smashingpmkns posted...
3) Doubtful. Fighting for the military would guarantee safety, money, and your freedoms. Wouldn't be the first example of members of a military killing their own family in defense of their country.


The Civil War proves that you're wrong and that it's not as black and white as that. The US military wouldn't be a full capacity single entity fighting against some small band of resistance.

Smashingpmkns posted...
5) a right that was imagined hundreds of years ago when the technology was primitive. Needs to be revised for the modern age.


How relevant a right is does not depend on when it was conceived. Gay marriage isn't going to stop being something we're all entitled to just because 1,000 years have passed in 3,017. It's a right, sorry not sorry.

You are ignoring a lot of history and current events if you really think an armed population isn't a deterrent for tyranny and corruption. And as such you're a complete waste of my time. But pls keep on demonstrating your deep ignorance and dishonesty, it's entertaining.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1