LogFAQs > #887978825

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Knowingly exposing others to HIV will no longer be a felony in California.
FLUFFYGERM 10/07/17 11:29:09 AM #29:	Unquestionable posted... FLUFFYGERM posted... lowtides posted... Hundreds of health organizations with research and evidence on HIV believe this will help public safety. Its not the liberals when hundreds health organizations backed this. But just judging by the clickbait titles will skew your perception. how in the fuck Yeah I really want to see some compelling evidence because right now I don't understand how willingly infecting someone with something you know will lower their quality of life isn't being considered up there with willingly crippling someone. it wouldn't just lower their quality of life. it'd basically end it. HIV treatment medication is expensive as fuck (several thousand per month without insurance) and it has some awful side effects and you have to take it religiously. and it doesn't cure it, it just makes it undetectable so that hopefully you don't get AIDS later. and you still have the stigma of telling your sexual partners you have it, which 99% of the time is going to mean that you're getting rejected. <cite>FLUFFYGERM posted [p:887978825] in Knowingly ... [t:75853740]...</cite> <quote><cite>Unquestionable posted...</cite> <quote><cite>FLUFFYGERM posted...</cite> <quote><cite>lowtides posted...</cite> <quote>Hundreds of health organizations with research and evidence on HIV believe this will help public safety. Its not the liberals when hundreds health organizations backed this. But just judging by the clickbait titles will skew your perception.</quote> how in the fuck</quote> Yeah I really want to see some compelling evidence because right now I don't understand how willingly infecting someone with something you know will lower their quality of life isn't being considered up there with willingly crippling someone.</quote> it wouldn't just lower their quality of life. it'd basically end it. HIV treatment medication is expensive as fuck (several thousand per month without insurance) and it has some awful side effects and you have to take it religiously. and it doesn't cure it, it just makes it undetectable so that hopefully you don't get AIDS later. and you still have the stigma of telling your sexual partners you have it, which 99% of the time is going to mean that you're getting rejected.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1