LogFAQs > #886191657

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	how is Clinton's new book? is it out yet?
Coffeebeanz 09/07/17 1:53:02 PM #44:	Anteaterking posted... Coffeebeanz posted... Anteaterking posted... Coffeebeanz posted... but I for one am f*ing tired of elitists crowning candidates as nominees even when the public isn't happy with the choice. What do you mean by "the public isn't happy with the choice"? You understand that Hilary won the primaries by a lot, right? And that under any other set of "rules" she still won? (Popular vote, no super-delegates, dividing it like the GOP does, etc.) She essentially ran unopposed by any serious DNC candidate. And she still barely won. I don't understand. Who are you blaming for the public not being happy with the choice that they ultimately made? Are you blaming the DNC because "no other serious candidate" ran? Because the DNC decided who their candidate would be long before the primaries happened, and did not give two shits about what their own voterbase cared about. When the emails came out, showing Debbie Wasserman Schultz colluding directly with the Hillary camp, it simply reaffirmed those suspicions to a lot of people. --- Physician [Internal Medicine] <cite>Coffeebeanz posted [p:886191657] in how is Cli... [t:75750944]...</cite> <quote><cite>Anteaterking posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Coffeebeanz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Anteaterking posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Coffeebeanz posted...</cite> <quote>but I for one am f*ing tired of elitists crowning candidates as nominees even when the public isn't happy with the choice. </quote> What do you mean by "the public isn't happy with the choice"? You understand that Hilary won the primaries by a lot, right? And that under any other set of "rules" she still won? (Popular vote, no super-delegates, dividing it like the GOP does, etc.)</quote> She essentially ran unopposed by any serious DNC candidate. And she still barely won.</quote> I don't understand. Who are you blaming for the public not being happy with the choice that they ultimately made? Are you blaming the DNC because "no other serious candidate" ran?</quote> Because the DNC decided who their candidate would be long before the primaries happened, and did not give two shits about what their own voterbase cared about. When the emails came out, showing Debbie Wasserman Schultz colluding directly with the Hillary camp, it simply reaffirmed those suspicions to a lot of people. --- Physician [Internal Medicine]</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1