LogFAQs > #885662811

KanzarisKelshen posted...

5.1 Removals: Big Four, Untyped, and Other
5.1.2 Intimidation and Subversion: The new Removal types

- Having both "untyped" and "other" removals seems unnecessarily complex. I would say that anything that is a removal but not one of the Big Four counts as "untyped," and leave it at that. (Or, if you want to be extra clean, get rid of untyped removals altogether and require everything to be classified as a specific removal type. self-kidnapping gogogo)

- Possession is mechanically weird - the merc is removed from their team, but is not removed from the battle. I remember this causing trouble in the past (thought not the specifics). I wouldn't be opposed to removing possession from the category of removals altogether, and just having it be its own category.

- I'm not sure what a Subversion is. But offhand I think all "cannot be rostered" type effects should just be a single category (unless there's a reason for differentiating them that escapes me atm). I also think they should remain distinct from removals because, mechanically, they're quite different - the merc is not removed, he's still there and can declare and be targeted by abilities as normal.

ZeeksFire posted...

I'd say remove the terminology of recharge weekly and the like when writing abilities though.

Of all the things that are potentially confusing in abilities, I feel like recharge terminology is the least of our problems. "Every three weeks" is perfectly clear. "Goes on cooldown for two weeks" is also clear. I guess I wouldn't mind it being standardized but it doesn't seem like a priority issue.
---

You put your RESOLVE HAT back on, which conveniently is the same hat as your NORMAL HAT.
{Drakeryn}