LogFAQs > #884121998

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicI've always argued that Bill Russell/Kareem > MJ, hence MJ is 3rd
FatalAccident
08/03/17 3:09:40 PM
#1:


I never realised though that there were nearly half as many teams when Russell played. Which kind of puts a downer on my argument, if there were twice as much competition would Russell have had half as many rings? Would he then be on par with Michael? Possibly giving the edge to MJ?

Who knows. I'd still put Russell and Kareem over MJ, you can't argue with stats. And MJ is probably considered the goat cause he played at a time when basketball was getting more media coverage and was able to build his brand more. So more people grew up on MJ than they did bill russell and Kareem.

I'd like to hear an argument of MJ being better than those two tbqh, and MJ is arguably fourth greatest of all time when you take Wilt into consideration. You can make the argument 6 rings > 2 rings but then again 30PPG and 20RPG > 30PPG and 5rpg soo
---
*walks away*
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1