LogFAQs > #882259867

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Climate Change Deniers confused now that facts show a 140% increase in change
Doctor Foxx 07/03/17 12:48:51 PM #23:	TreGooda posted... deoxxys posted... ^what the hell does this mean?? No warming in 2 decades. They extrapolated data from incorrect models created in 2000. That's not it at all. Interpretation of data was incorrect for a period of time. Those that had been interpreting the data were using it to support an agenda that dismisses anthropogenic climate change. Using 1998 as the starting date, (an unusually hot year due to El Nino) the difference in the last 20 years can seem small. When you look further back and do not use the outlier 1998 as a baseline the changes are much more apparent. Re interpretation of the data from scientists that understand climate science shows the increase in temperature is much greater than previous reports. As more data for 2014 - present day becomes interpreted and included in the reports the changes will be more apparent and drastic. 1998 doesn't even touch the last several years of global temperatures. (your link is also 6 months older than the original post article which explains the recently reinterpreted data) --- Never write off the Doctor! <cite>Doctor Foxx posted [p:882259867] in Climate Ch... [t:75525897]...</cite> <quote><cite>TreGooda posted...</cite> <quote><cite>deoxxys posted...</cite> <quote>^what the hell does this mean??</quote> No warming in 2 decades. They extrapolated data from incorrect models created in 2000.</quote> That's not it at all. Interpretation of data was incorrect for a period of time. Those that had been interpreting the data were using it to support an agenda that dismisses anthropogenic climate change. Using 1998 as the starting date, (an unusually hot year due to El Nino) the difference in the last 20 years can seem small. When you look further back and do not use the outlier 1998 as a baseline the changes are much more apparent. Re interpretation of the data from scientists that understand climate science shows the increase in temperature is much greater than previous reports. As more data for 2014 - present day becomes interpreted and included in the reports the changes will be more apparent and drastic. 1998 doesn't even touch the last several years of global temperatures. (your link is also 6 months older than the original post article which explains the recently reinterpreted data) --- Never write off the Doctor!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1