LogFAQs > #881520982

Jakyl25 posted...

You see that excerpt of cop dude's testimony going around where he's like "I thought he was stoned, and I knew that if he was capable of smoking weed in the car with a child and exposing her to second hand smoke, there's no telling how far he'd go if he wanted to stop me."

It might actually be the most insane thing I've ever read.

EDIT:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DCzFAKPUwAA7Yni?format=jpg&name=large

wow this cop was the one person who still thinks reefer madness is a documentary.
from my understanding the not guilty verdict was because there was reasonable doubt on whether or not the guy was reaching? i've been busy with other things and haven't read up on this much. but if so the whole thing sounds like a case where reasonable doubt is at a level rarely applied, to the point where it's fair to think it's unreasonable.

and the closest thing to accountability would be body cams that don't conveniently turn themselves off.
---

"Maybe it's a tentacle, molesting the planet itself. - Aschen Brodel.