LogFAQs > #878794806

Smarkil posted...

Comey is a real rollercoaster for both sides.

First he's anti hillary cause he investigated her emails or some shit.

Then he said there's nothing wrong with her so he's anti-repub

Then he sent some shit to congress before the election so hes anti hillary again and apparently was trying to rig the election

Then he investigated trump so hes anti repub

It's a whole thing.

Investigating her emails is justifiable and doesn't make him anti-anything.

When he said she did nothing criminal, he still decided to deride her publicly for her reckless actions. There's a reason making moral judgments on the accused that have no basis in the facts is a huge n-no in law enforcement, it's basically abusing your position of authority to assassinate someone's character. That moment was very much anti-Democrat, unless you think anything short of literally trying her for crimes she didn't commit is falling short of being fair.

His words DID rig the election, and were baseless. Then just this week, he claimed there were classified emails sent to Anthony Weiner and that turned out to be a lie (some...not many...were made classified after being sent...which means she did NOT "send classified emails" since when she sent them they weren't). As anti-Dem as you can get.

Investigating Trump over legit concerns of Russian influence is not anti-anything, just as investigating her emails wasn't. HOWEVER, publicly tongue lashing her and then saying there's a breakthrough in the case that classified emails MAY have been sent (only to find out later once they actually looked through them, oops...nope, "maybe we should have properly examined the evidence before I opened my fucking mouth") while simultaneously not saying a peep about the investigation into Russian hacking the Dems? Very anti-Dem. Again.

I don't like Hillary, so much that I voted 3rd party. But your account of Comey's actions are complete bull shit.