LogFAQs > #878556403

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Guardians of the Galaxy 2 is better than the first one.
steroidz_da_pwn 05/05/17 9:44:55 PM #13:	OctilIery posted... Mernardi posted... I think they fleshed the characters out a lot more because they didn't need to introduce most of them. The villain was a lot better this time around and the character interactions were really funny. I was dying throughout the whole film honestly. Dear God yes, they turned up the comedy so much. I was afraid they'd overuse baby groom, but everything was well balanced. I thought the opening with Baby Groot was a little overkill, but other than that he was perfect. My whole theater was laughing hysterically when he was trying to get the fin. I was also legitimately pissed when the ravagers were fucking with him. --- Not changing this sig till Jack Swagger (won) and Evan Bourne win world titles. Started 1/1/09 <cite>steroidz_da_pwn posted [p:878556403] in Guardians ... [t:75315019]...</cite> <quote><cite>OctilIery posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Mernardi posted...</cite> <quote>I think they fleshed the characters out a lot more because they didn't need to introduce most of them. The villain was a lot better this time around and the character interactions were really funny. I was dying throughout the whole film honestly.</quote> Dear God yes, they turned up the comedy so much. I was afraid they'd overuse baby groom, but everything was well balanced.</quote> I thought the opening with Baby Groot was a little overkill, but other than that he was perfect. My whole theater was laughing hysterically when he was trying to get the fin. I was also legitimately pissed when the ravagers were fucking with him. --- Not changing this sig till Jack Swagger (won) and Evan Bourne win world titles. Started 1/1/09</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1