LogFAQs > #877236012

Naye745 posted...

couple thoughts since i've last followed this list:

richard is really hard to quantify, given that he really "invented" the first survivor strategy. that said, he shouldn't be #1. i can accept that ranking and understand it, but personally i don't think it took a level of gameplay that matches the top winners.

todd is too high at #4. (inviso's spot seems pretty good) he was really, really good with the jury but made some not-great decisions and managed to get credit for all the good moves of his alliance. obviously there's some benefits in that but #4 puts him below some winners who completely dominated and shifted all the right times. (or stopped the game from shifting against them)

Yeah. Again, I respect Richard's win and find him a lot more impressive than your average casual, but I still don't think he warrants the number one spot on the basis of his legacy.

With Todd, it really came down to just how much Amanda's poor performance changed peoples' minds at the final tribal council. Todd had a great FTC, but Amanda blowing up swayed a LOT of votes against her.
---

Touch fuzzy. Get fuzzier.
Inviso