LogFAQs > #876928579

ShinyMasamuneZ posted...

The 'kid' in the story was a 23-year-old who actually shot a bunch of teenagers. He deserves to be able to protect his home regardless, but let's not sugar coat this story.

Huehuehue I thought he was a teen...but yeah my opinion is below. Notice how Proudclad kept blowing up at me...dude needs to learn how to talk hockeybub89 posted...

Logos posted...

CruelBuffalo posted...

Anarchy_Juiblex posted...

CruelBuffalo posted...

I didn't say he can't use it. I said he would have likely been fine with weaker firepower...which the original post implied he wouldn't have been safe had not had that specific weapon.

Most proponents of magazine limits put it around 7-9 rounds. That's easy to blow through on the first assailant. I don't know how many times the kid shot, how many misses, but it's entirely possible that he blew through 10 shots or more before getting the last person.

And how likely were he criminals going to flee in this situation when shots are fired. Do you think they will view it as worth it to add murder to their burglary charges?

So you want to leave people trapped because you're under some impression that the criminals are just going to run away rather than try to kill?

I don't want to sound like I'm defending robbers, but most criminals aren't looking for an excuse to murder. That's not to say I want guns banned, but murder isn't just the next logical step for all criminals. The world is slightly more gray than good law abiding citizens and bloodthirsty animal criminals.

This