[B8L] Post #563113

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	First impression, fellow perfects: are you tempted by the 1% option?
PartOfYourWorld 12/17/11 2:57:00 AM #28:	Not at all. The notion of risking 63 consecutive calls on such accuracy is baffling to me. I doubt anyone in the top 60 will make an attempt just because the risk is so insane. Picking every single match right just to end up with zero points, woohoo. From: Pondos \| #023 I don't see why any perfects wouldn't go with 5%. That's a pretty big increment to work with. Because we are limited to increments of five, meaning we can pick 55-60 or 60-65, but not 58-63. This makes it much tougher, as I believe the general consensus atm is Link beating Mario with right around 60%. -- Yoblazer: http://i43.tinypic.com/25z1non.jpg Watch and you'll see... someday I'll be... part of your world! <cite>PartOfYourWorld posted [p:563113] in First impr... [t:61374665]...</cite> <quote> Not at all. The notion of risking 63 consecutive calls on such accuracy is baffling to me. I doubt anyone in the top 60 will make an attempt just because the risk is so insane. Picking every single match right just to end up with zero points, woohoo. From: Pondos \| #023I don't see why any perfects wouldn't go with 5%. That's a pretty big increment to work with.Because we are limited to increments of five, meaning we can pick 55-60 or 60-65, but not 58-63. This makes it much tougher, as I believe the general consensus atm is Link beating Mario with right around 60%. -- Yoblazer: http://i43.tinypic.com/25z1non.jpgWatch and you'll see... someday I'll be... part of your world! </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1

Page List: 1

Topic

First impression, fellow perfects: are you tempted by the 1% option?

PartOfYourWorld
12/17/11 2:57:00 AM
#28:

Not at all. The notion of risking 63 consecutive calls on such accuracy is baffling to me. I doubt anyone in the top 60 will make an attempt just because the risk is so insane. Picking every single match right just to end up with zero points, woohoo.

From: Pondos | #023
I don't see why any perfects wouldn't go with 5%. That's a pretty big increment to work with.

Because we are limited to increments of five, meaning we can pick 55-60 or 60-65, but not 58-63. This makes it much tougher, as I believe the general consensus atm is Link beating Mario with right around 60%.

--
Yoblazer: http://i43.tinypic.com/25z1non.jpg
Watch and you'll see... someday I'll be... part of your world!

<cite>PartOfYourWorld posted [p:563113] in First impr... [t:61374665]...</cite>
<quote>
        Not at all. The notion of risking 63 consecutive calls on such accuracy is baffling to me. I doubt anyone in the top 60 will make an attempt just because the risk is so insane. Picking every single match right just to end up with zero points, woohoo. From: Pondos | #023I don't see why any perfects wouldn't go with 5%. That's a pretty big increment to work with.Because we are limited to increments of five, meaning we can pick 55-60 or 60-65, but not 58-63. This makes it much tougher, as I believe the general consensus atm is Link beating Mario with right around 60%.
        
            --
            Yoblazer: http://i43.tinypic.com/25z1non.jpgWatch and you'll see... someday I'll be... part of your world!

        
    
    
    </quote>

... Copied to Clipboard!

Topic List

Page List: 1

LogFAQs > #563113