I don't think I was vague at all! What else could I be referring to in my post besides flaming? I just said it would be easy to see how it could be interpreted as being against the ToU, and if you know anything about the ToU (which you act like you do), you'd know I was referring to flaming.
1) I actually didn't know what you were referring to - the ToU is vague, so you could have been referring to a number of statements in it.
2) I don't think it's easy to see how it could be interpreted as being against the ToU at all. The flaming portion of the ToU applies to users who post on the GameFAQs message boards, not companies. See Moogle's example - is it flaming to say that Microsoft is terrible? Or WalMart? That's ridiculous.
I criticized you for missing the point of my initial statement, and instead you talk about how, since I was apparently vague, that you had no other recourse but to be vague in return.
1) I don't know what I should say in reply to the "missing the point" business. Sorry for not immediately realizing what you were talking about? >_>
2) I don't think I was vague in return at all. I was saying that Blulum's topic wasn't against the ToU because the ToU doesn't mention anything about the word cancer. Later in the topic I supplied other arguments to back up my "Blulum's topic wasn't against the ToU" point.
--
Full rap metal jacket ~ Method Man