1) Did Ezio deserve to win?
He seems assassiny and well-liked enough. I certainly can't see he didn't deserve it.
2) What was the biggest surprise/disappointment of this contest?
Surprise - Bourne at 15th. Guy was barely hanging on in like the 70s and 80s.
Disappointment - Shelly at 28th, after he looked so good for most rounds.
3) Are you happy with the rules and do you think no trading gives way to a more true winner, or would you prefer to have trading in this contest if it were up to you?
Yes to both questions. I'm happy with it as is and it gets a stereotypical winner, but I don't feel like that's necessary and it could be more fun with trading.