LogFAQs > #962665592

LazLemon posted...

Is the body not a p big piece of evidence?

If there was a body, it would be. However, there wasn't even an intact skull. The dental match was apparently made against loose teeth. Offhand, I can't even remember if any of the teeth were even secured to the skull, but they had to reconstruct the skull

If you read Ducky's post at the start of this topic, it covers the fact the skeleton was mostly raided by scavengers, although he doesn't go into as much detail.

Anyway, after an extensive search through the area -- which also has hikers going through there on a regular basis -- Brian's parents just so happen to find Brian's stuff near a collection of loose bones, which they bring authorities to.

And those remains were in such bad condition that the first two experts ruled it inconclusive. At this point, it seems pretty clear they rushed shit just to close the books on this case, and mostly to save face because this investigation went nowhere before social media influencers got involved. The cops were content to just leave it as a missing persons case.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/autopsy-brian-laundrie-s-remains-came-back-inconclusive-attorney-says-n1282259

Revelation34 posted...

Because everything has to be a conspiracy theory now.

Again, who found the remains? And those remains were found AFTER the area was already searched and you had hikers in the area, yet they're claiming he was dead and there all along. That shit doesn't add up. However, we know that the family had initially covered for him -- you know, the same family who just happened to find the remains.

And considering the number of people who have faked their deaths only to turn up years later, it's hardly implausible, especially given what we know about the dirtbag family.