LogFAQs > #962481366

UnfairRepresent posted...

By your logic the fact her outfit was black could be "perceived" as a political statement by a f***ing moron. You can percieve anything as anything. People percieve Harry Potter as satanitc.

If 0.005% of the population get offended by a color of an outfit, that's a "you" problem directed at that 0.005%. Now if 50% of the population gets offended by a color of an outfit, or interprets the color of the outfit negatively, then clearly according to that population, that outfit is making a negative statement.

We're almost 2 years from the summer of 2020 riots. That wasn't free. To think BLM was an innocent protest and the billions of dollars worth of damages lost and the lives lost in those riots were outliers, that's foolish.

Tsuyoi3 posted...

Hell, when racists on here bring up "why doesn't BLM protest black on black crime" it's rightly pointed out that it's about systemic issues with police.

Anyone could make a case that if you reduce the amount of black on black crime, it would reduce the interactions with police and reduce negative encounters. The death of Amir Locke was tied to the police hunting for a suspect connected to a homicide. This is the reason why the crime rates are brought up in regards to the police brutality issue, blaming the police isn't going to reduce the amount the bullets flying in my neighborhood.