LogFAQs > #962444445

Ruvan22 posted...

I get that they (RNC) weren't happy back then and I remember them (the state party) censuring her back then for the impeachment hearing. What I'm asking is WHY you believe the recent censure is related to that when A) nothing in the language indicates it, B) there is a more recent event (the committee) pulling focus, and C) the state censure (that you linked) states Antifa and BLM were responsible, nothing about "legitimate political discourse".

because the impeachment is about the same thing being reviewed now. i'm saying its related (not the entire thing) because its an ongoing saga that those two peoples' names have been attached to. this censure relates to the entire string of events following from the initial reaction until now. they are saying its an ongoing issue that they are now getting punished for, starting from a year ago. this persecution, in their minds, started from then, and they are being punished for their role in this persecution, which in part, targets people who were only engaging in legitimate political discourse, and people who were onlysupporting the legitimate actions/behaviors, and then unfairly being attached to other things they had no part of.