LogFAQs > #962071838

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	9 y/o Sobs UNCONTROLLABLY as she and 6 ANTI-VAXXERS are ARRESTED!!!
SKARDAVNELNATE 01/25/22 5:17:35 PM #44:	LinkPizza posted... Thats not what he said, though He used specific words He used specific words which didn't apply to what he responded to. adjl posted... If you have a crowd of 1000 people and 6 of them are causing trouble, arresting those 6 entails identifying them No, the 6 wouldn't get arrested because they're part of a protest. I know you have difficulty with abstract thinking so recall the actual news reports from 2020 and the reporters standing in front of buildings on fire. Now you might think that the people who set the fire are guilty of arson, and the other protesters are accomplices, and the news reporter who downplayed the seriousness of the crime are complicit in it and inciting people to commit more. But think about everything that's not on fire. Since as a whole it's still mostly peaceful it qualifies as being part of a protest and the arson isn't that much of an issue. You might have been concerned about the stores that were smashed up and looted. And the cost of just clearing away the debris is more than insurance (if they had any) will pay out to the owner thus ruining their livelihoods. But remember that it's not on the scale you would see if there had been enough violence to call it a riot so it's fine. adjl posted... conspiracy by the government to checks notes erode its own ability to enforce its laws I don't know where you got those notes, or what they're for, but they don't pertain to anything I've said. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:962071838] in 9 y/o Sobs... [t:79865413]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Thats not what he said, though He used specific words</quote>He used specific words which didn't apply to what he responded to. adjl posted... </cite> <quote>If you have a crowd of 1000 people and 6 of them are causing trouble, arresting those 6 entails identifying them</quote>No, the 6 wouldn't get arrested because they're part of a protest. I know you have difficulty with abstract thinking so recall the actual news reports from 2020 and the reporters standing in front of buildings on fire. Now you might think that the people who set the fire are guilty of arson, and the other protesters are accomplices, and the news reporter who downplayed the seriousness of the crime are complicit in it and inciting people to commit more. But think about everything that's not on fire. Since as a whole it's still mostly peaceful it qualifies as being part of a protest and the arson isn't that much of an issue. You might have been concerned about the stores that were smashed up and looted. And the cost of just clearing away the debris is more than insurance (if they had any) will pay out to the owner thus ruining their livelihoods. But remember that it's not on the scale you would see if there had been enough violence to call it a riot so it's fine. adjl posted... </cite> <quote>conspiracy by the government to checks notes erode its own ability to enforce its laws</quote>I don't know where you got those notes, or what they're for, but they don't pertain to anything I've said. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1