LogFAQs > #962023178

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	All 4 NFL games were awesome this weekend
Taharqa_ 01/23/22 11:02:05 PM #24:	Aristoph posted... If you don't think the Bills would have gotten a touchdown if they got a possession, you don't watch football very much. Both defenses were gassed at the end. Neither side could stop a damn thing. Hence why we ended up in overtime in the first place. The fact that Buffalo never got to touch the ball in overtime is a problem. Period. And it would have been just as infuriating if the Bills had won the coin toss and the Chiefs never got to touch the ball in OT. The rule is fucking stupid and people have been complaining about it for years. It needs to be changed. Both teams should get at least one possession. I'm not sure why this is even up for debate. It'd be like if Baseball decided that if you score a run in the top of the 10th inning, the game just ends and the other team doesn't get to bat. You'd be laughed out of the park for even suggesting one team doesn't get a chance to respond. After years of only needing a FG to win OT this complaint falls on deaf ears to me. If the Bills hold them to a FG they get a chance to respond, they didn't. They also had 13 seconds and let KC get into FG range in 2 plays... --- "We tried to tell y'all." - African-American proverb <cite>Taharqa_ posted [p:962023178] in All 4 NFL ... [t:79866891]...</cite> <quote>Aristoph posted... </cite> <quote>If you don't think the Bills would have gotten a touchdown if they got a possession, you don't watch football very much. Both defenses were gassed at the end. Neither side could stop a damn thing. Hence why we ended up in overtime in the first place. The fact that Buffalo never got to touch the ball in overtime is a problem. Period. And it would have been just as infuriating if the Bills had won the coin toss and the Chiefs never got to touch the ball in OT. The rule is fucking stupid and people have been complaining about it for years. It needs to be changed. Both teams should get at least one possession. I'm not sure why this is even up for debate. It'd be like if Baseball decided that if you score a run in the top of the 10th inning, the game just ends and the other team doesn't get to bat. You'd be laughed out of the park for even suggesting one team doesn't get a chance to respond.</quote> After years of only needing a FG to win OT this complaint falls on deaf ears to me. If the Bills hold them to a FG they get a chance to respond, they didn't. They also had 13 seconds and let KC get into FG range in 2 plays... --- "We tried to tell y'all." - African-American proverb</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1