LogFAQs > #961724205

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Having a romantic encounter tonight, 2nd time since COVID started
NeoShadowhen 01/13/22 6:10:57 PM #66:	bsp77 posted... This is tricky for me. If there truly is 0% chance of transmission, then that is different than STDs. I don't know if it truly is 0% though. This is the kind of thing that has to be disclosed before having a serious relationship for sure, similar to many other things like inability to have children (like me, I'm snipped), but doesn't have to be said before a hookup. I don't know ultimately Effectively, it is 0%, and the concept of U=U (undetectable = untransmittable) has had a mountain of support over the years. But yeah, it does bring up some difficult questions. And it does seem to hinge on whether or not undetectable HIV is considered an STD. But that almost seems like a semantic argument. The problem that TC is in is that they want the other person to disclose, but they do not want to disclose also. They could make the argument that since it is undetectable that it doesnt count, but the real question is whether the other person would feel the same way. My only opinion on the matter is that TC shouldnt lie. Because lying in order to get sex is well, not okay, to say the least. <cite>NeoShadowhen posted [p:961724205] in Having a r... [t:79851572]...</cite> <quote>bsp77 posted... </cite> <quote>This is tricky for me. If there truly is 0% chance of transmission, then that is different than STDs. I don't know if it truly is 0% though. This is the kind of thing that has to be disclosed before having a serious relationship for sure, similar to many other things like inability to have children (like me, I'm snipped), but doesn't have to be said before a hookup. I don't know ultimately</quote> Effectively, it is 0%, and the concept of U=U (undetectable = untransmittable) has had a mountain of support over the years. But yeah, it does bring up some difficult questions. And it does seem to hinge on whether or not undetectable HIV is considered an STD. But that almost seems like a semantic argument. The problem that TC is in is that they want the other person to disclose, but they do not want to disclose also. They could make the argument that since it is undetectable that it doesnt count, but the real question is whether the other person would feel the same way. My only opinion on the matter is that TC shouldnt lie. Because lying in order to get sex is well, not okay, to say the least. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1