LogFAQs > #961433816

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The point of LOCKDOWNS is to NOT Overwhelm HOSPITALS. Does it make sense to you?
SKARDAVNELNATE 01/03/22 10:50:07 AM #69:	LinkPizza posted... I think people not being treated because the hospitals are overwhelmed in more detrimental effect of people than being stuck at home for a certain amount of time You do realize I'm thinking in broader terms than being stuck at home for a certain amount of time, right? I'm looking at the long term effects well beyond the amount of time they are stuck at home. LinkPizza posted... You realize that 40% on people being a symptomatic is bad, right? No, that means the virus alone is harmless to them. The only bad thing about it is that it's not closer to 100%. Which would render the virus harmless to everyone and there would be no concern over it's spread. LinkPizza posted... Instead of worrying about how sad youll be because you can go party, you should worry about people as a whole. I clearly am by looking at the long term effects. The detrimental aspects don't end when the lockdown is lifted and someone can attend a party. LinkPizza posted... Youre just a selfish person. Thats your problem You dont care about anybody, which is why you dont want a lockdown I care about people in a different way than you do. I want them to have a good quality of life. I think the current situation would be improved if more people had the attitude that they'll live how they want or die trying. I see no point in prolonging life if that is denied to them. I don't want lockdowns because I care about people. Wanting lockdowns because other people should take responsibility for your health is the position of a selfish person. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB <cite>SKARDAVNELNATE posted [p:961433816] in The point ... [t:79825906]...</cite> <quote>LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>I think people not being treated because the hospitals are overwhelmed in more detrimental effect of people than being stuck at home for a certain amount of time</quote>You do realize I'm thinking in broader terms than being stuck at home for a certain amount of time, right? I'm looking at the long term effects well beyond the amount of time they are stuck at home. LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>You realize that 40% on people being a symptomatic is bad, right?</quote>No, that means the virus alone is harmless to them. The only bad thing about it is that it's not closer to 100%. Which would render the virus harmless to everyone and there would be no concern over it's spread. LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Instead of worrying about how sad youll be because you can go party, you should worry about people as a whole.</quote>I clearly am by looking at the long term effects. The detrimental aspects don't end when the lockdown is lifted and someone can attend a party. LinkPizza posted... </cite> <quote>Youre just a selfish person. Thats your problem You dont care about anybody, which is why you dont want a lockdown</quote>I care about people in a different way than you do. I want them to have a good quality of life. I think the current situation would be improved if more people had the attitude that they'll live how they want or die trying. I see no point in prolonging life if that is denied to them. I don't want lockdowns because I care about people. Wanting lockdowns because other people should take responsibility for your health is the position of a selfish person. --- No locked doors, no windows barred. No more things to make my brain seem SKARD. Look at Mr. Technical over here >.> -BTB</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1