LogFAQs > #961343405

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The point of LOCKDOWNS is to NOT Overwhelm HOSPITALS. Does it make sense to you?
LinkPizza 12/30/21 9:31:14 PM #61:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... I don't. I hold that lockdowns have a greater detrimental effect on people than hospitals have a beneficial effect to them. So having lockdowns to benefit hospitals in the hopes of that benefit carrying over to people is self defeating. I disagree. I think people being able to be treated in hospitals when they need to be in a good things. And if the lockdowns help with keeping hospitals from getting overwhelmed like they are, which they will, then thats good I think people not being treated because the hospitals are overwhelmed in more detrimental effect of people than being stuck at home for a certain amount of time SKARDAVNELNATE posted... Something like 40% of people who tested positive were asymptomatic. There are people who never had a reason to get tested. There are people who tested positive and only had a mild case. These people did not need to be hospitalized. The effect of the virus on these people was none at all to a mild inconvenience. The negative effects of the virus do not apply to everyone. The negative effects of lockdowns do apply to everyone due to economic and societal impacts. You realize that 40% on people being a symptomatic is bad, right? Thats part of the reason the lockdowns are actual kind of important And it doesnt matter how much of an inconvenience it is to them. This lockdown is to help EVERYBODY. And those same people will start crying as soon as it does inconvenience them. Like taking a loved one away. Its already happened so many times. Instead of worrying about how sad youll be because you can go party, you should worry about people as a whole. People dying or being hospitalized (especially in a hospital with no room) is worse than missing out on party or whatever And the negative effects of the virus dont effect everyone until they do. Many people didnt have the negative effects affect them at first. Then they had a family member who died from it, or caught a different variant that did affect them. Youre just a selfish person. Thats your problem You dont care about anybody, which is why you dont want a lockdown SKARDAVNELNATE posted... I argue they aren't needed now. They only make the situation worse. I disagree. I think trying to slow down the spread of a disease and keep hospitals less full for when people need to go there is a good thing. --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:961343405] in The point ... [t:79825906]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>I don't. I hold that lockdowns have a greater detrimental effect on people than hospitals have a beneficial effect to them. So having lockdowns to benefit hospitals in the hopes of that benefit carrying over to people is self defeating.</quote> I disagree. I think people being able to be treated in hospitals when they need to be in a good things. And if the lockdowns help with keeping hospitals from getting overwhelmed like they are, which they will, then thats good I think people not being treated because the hospitals are overwhelmed in more detrimental effect of people than being stuck at home for a certain amount of time SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>Something like 40% of people who tested positive were asymptomatic. There are people who never had a reason to get tested. There are people who tested positive and only had a mild case. These people did not need to be hospitalized. The effect of the virus on these people was none at all to a mild inconvenience. The negative effects of the virus do not apply to everyone. The negative effects of lockdowns do apply to everyone due to economic and societal impacts.</quote> You realize that 40% on people being a symptomatic is bad, right? Thats part of the reason the lockdowns are actual kind of important And it doesnt matter how much of an inconvenience it is to them. This lockdown is to help EVERYBODY. And those same people will start crying as soon as it does inconvenience them. Like taking a loved one away. Its already happened so many times. Instead of worrying about how sad youll be because you can go party, you should worry about people as a whole. People dying or being hospitalized (especially in a hospital with no room) is worse than missing out on party or whatever And the negative effects of the virus dont effect everyone until they do. Many people didnt have the negative effects affect them at first. Then they had a family member who died from it, or caught a different variant that did affect them. Youre just a selfish person. Thats your problem You dont care about anybody, which is why you dont want a lockdown SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>I argue they aren't needed now. They only make the situation worse.</quote> I disagree. I think trying to slow down the spread of a disease and keep hospitals less full for when people need to go there is a good thing. --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1