LogFAQs > #961240420

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The point of LOCKDOWNS is to NOT Overwhelm HOSPITALS. Does it make sense to you?
LinkPizza 12/26/21 10:47:47 PM #51:	SKARDAVNELNATE posted... Not if if the net result is negative. Sure. But if the hospitals are less swarmed, then that's a positive... SKARDAVNELNATE posted... That's up to the individual. Though that choice is made significantly harder after the lockdown weakens the economy. I meant to say, "Obviously, you can still go to the hospital if you need medical care." And the choice is only harder for some people. People who understand how important health it will usually go when they need actual medical care... SKARDAVNELNATE posted... It also damages the economy, worsens the mental health of people, reduces social cohesion. induces anxiety, and possibly more. Maybe. But just spreading a virus around without a care in the world is also harmful. And if we all work together to try to reduce the virus, then lockdown like this won't be necessary. But when people fight the lockdown, it causes the lockdown to not only last longer, but to possibly have to be enacted again. Nobody likes the lockdown. But it is needed. Like how not many people like to work, but that's one of the main ways to make money... Sometimes, you have to do things you don't like... SKARDAVNELNATE posted... They aren't in hospitals and therefore not triggering the lockdown. And? They still deserve some of the blame for passing on the virus, causing others to have to go to the hospital. Hence, they are helping to trigger the lockdown. That's like saying a person who got shot is at fault for taking up a hospital bed, but the person who shot them doesn't take aby of the blame. Just like the person who shot another takes some of the blame for putting someone else in the hospital, the person who passed on the virus is at blame for putting someone else in the hospital... SKARDAVNELNATE posted... Again, the spread isn't the triggering variable. The spread is part of the trigger variable. If people weren't spreading it, then less people would have it meaning the lockdown wouldn't be needed. I feel like that's pretty easy to understand... Spreading it is, at the very least, causing the triggering variable... SKARDAVNELNATE posted... We're talking about people who have refused medical treatment. Treating a person without their consent is medical battery. Then they should stop a bad person and stay home... That's also something simple they could do... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around. <cite>LinkPizza posted [p:961240420] in The point ... [t:79825906]...</cite> <quote>SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>Not if if the net result is negative.</quote> Sure. But if the hospitals are less swarmed, then that's a positive... SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>That's up to the individual. Though that choice is made significantly harder after the lockdown weakens the economy.</quote> I meant to say, "Obviously, you can still go to the hospital if you need medical care." And the choice is only harder for some people. People who understand how important health it will usually go when they need actual medical care... SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>It also damages the economy, worsens the mental health of people, reduces social cohesion. induces anxiety, and possibly more.</quote> Maybe. But just spreading a virus around without a care in the world is also harmful. And if we all work together to try to reduce the virus, then lockdown like this won't be necessary. But when people fight the lockdown, it causes the lockdown to not only last longer, but to possibly have to be enacted again. Nobody likes the lockdown. But it is needed. Like how not many people like to work, but that's one of the main ways to make money... Sometimes, you have to do things you don't like... SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>They aren't in hospitals and therefore not triggering the lockdown.</quote> And? They still deserve some of the blame for passing on the virus, causing others to have to go to the hospital. Hence, they are helping to trigger the lockdown. That's like saying a person who got shot is at fault for taking up a hospital bed, but the person who shot them doesn't take aby of the blame. Just like the person who shot another takes some of the blame for putting someone else in the hospital, the person who passed on the virus is at blame for putting someone else in the hospital... SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>Again, the spread isn't the triggering variable.</quote> The spread is part of the trigger variable. If people weren't spreading it, then less people would have it meaning the lockdown wouldn't be needed. I feel like that's pretty easy to understand... Spreading it is, at the very least, causing the triggering variable... SKARDAVNELNATE posted...</cite> <quote>We're talking about people who have refused medical treatment. Treating a person without their consent is medical battery.</quote> Then they should stop a bad person and stay home... That's also something simple they could do... --- Official King of Kings Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1