LogFAQs > #961191523

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicHollywood Superstar Tom Holland disagrees with Famed Director Martin Scorsese
Slayer_22
12/24/21 8:52:53 PM
#45:


Godnorgosh posted...


They're not functionally the same, though... films classified as high art function to express the auteur's artistic vision, usually irrespective of mass appeal. Low art is created with the purpose of driving mass appeal, mass viewership, and as a result, profit. One is creator-driven, the other is fundamentally viewer-driven.

But what creates that distinction? What if the creator's artistic vision to to create something that has mass appeal? Wouldn't that qualify as high art?

The qualifications can be easily ignored if you take into consideration that the only objective of the concept of low or high art is to attempt to give them a distinction based solely around the concept that one is better than the other.

---
"And no I'm not signing your twitter after this type of attitude so don't ask..." - IIINCORRUPTIBLE
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1