LogFAQs > #960732536

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Democrats fall flat with 'Latinx' language
divot1338 12/08/21 2:05:03 PM #34:	g0ldie posted... one thing - just because a small minority of people might use it, it doesn't invalidate it. it's still a relatively new term that grew from the desire of others to have a classification that was more inclusive, and you're going to have some pushback from older, prevailing attitudes. it's not like we haven't seen similar struggles in English speaking areas, and that those struggles don't still exist. Two percent of hispanics approve of it. That means more LGBT hispanics disapprove of it than approve. So who precisely is this for? And why should the wishes 98% of hispanics be ignored when there is already an acceptable nongendered term available to them? --- Moustache twirling villian https://i.imgur.com/U3lt3H4.jpg- Kerbey <cite>divot1338 posted [p:960732536] in Democrats ... [t:79800924]...</cite> <quote>g0ldie posted... </cite> <quote>one thing - just because a small minority of people might use it, it doesn't invalidate it. it's still a relatively new term that grew from the desire of others to have a classification that was more inclusive, and you're going to have some pushback from older, prevailing attitudes. it's not like we haven't seen similar struggles in English speaking areas, and that those struggles don't still exist.</quote>Two percent of hispanics approve of it. That means more LGBT hispanics disapprove of it than approve. So who precisely is this for? And why should the wishes 98% of hispanics be ignored when there is already an acceptable nongendered term available to them? --- Moustache twirling villian https://i.imgur.com/U3lt3H4.jpg- Kerbey</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1