LogFAQs > #960603926

I'm not sure if that's more misleading or untrue. However, from a natural dynamic, the only time having more women than men is a greater benefit is during repopulation, and even then that's less because of "eggs [being] rarer and more valuable" and more the result that one man with ninety-nine women can result in 99+ babies in a year whereas a 50/50 split would just let to 50+ children. However, that's only an argument in an absurd last-man-on-Earth hypothetical and, even then, you'd run into all kinds of issues because there might be too much common ancestry so you'd need a different breakdown (and that's not even getting into the fact having more males would make rebuilding a lot faster, and that a high birth rate would outstrip resources so there'd be no real benefit there anyway).

its almost like you need both sexes for a healthy ecosystem

leave me alone Zeus your arguments are droll and without point

---

Mead alt. It's fine.