LogFAQs > #960169234

In the AA incident you have 3 redneck "good ol boys" hunting down a black guy running in their neighborhood. Trying to cry "citizens arrest" because they thought him guilty of stealing or something. Instead of just calling police like they should have done if they truly believed him to be the person doing it and let the cops sort it out. A probably terrified AA tries to defend himself and he is murdered in the street. That citizens arrest thing really needs to be reevaluated
I see guilty here, its just a matter of how guilty (what level of murder) I don't see it going well for them. They need to just ask what exactly where the intentions of these guys when they jumped in their trucks and went after him. Was their intention to kill him from the start, or was it a case of the whole situation spiraling out of control and they shot him out of fear because he fought back? I'm thinking it probably resides somewhere at the 2nd Degree Murder for the two and 3rd degree for the camera man... if those charges are even on the table. I haven't been paying as much attention to it.

Which is different than the RH case. Where you have a bunch of people who on ALL sides SHOULD NOT have been there. "Peaceful protesters" my ass all over the country during that time you had people going out to "protests" with their actual motive to riot, pillage and steal. They were all there where they didn't belong, those people chose to go after and try and attack RH which I find beyond stupid considering he had a gun strapped to his chest and RH defended himself, and I sure as hell don't like the kid or his political views, I do believe he had every right to defend himself. (I mean what he's supposed to do? let them attack him? gtfo if you actually think so) This one should have never even gone to trial.

---

My Gaming PC - https://pcpartpicker.com/list/xCxDK3, Pic - https://imgur.com/a/3fWOAhp