LogFAQs > #960086047

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicProfessor sparks outrage for rebranding pedophiles as minor-attracted people.
Fony
11/17/21 1:46:49 PM
#63:


Gobstoppers12 posted...
Problem is, there's no reliable way to predict whether or not these people will hurt a child until they actually do it. Nobody is a criminal until they commit a crime, but some people have the potential to commit worse crimes than others. Even just confessing to an attraction to minors should get a person put on a list.


Agreed. The problem with acceptance and anti-stigma folks is they want no list at all. They want to frame these people as a marginalized group and want them to not be restricted from things like working at an elementary school. They even try to frame perception such that 13 year olds aren't children. That particular argument was had here just a few days ago.

The guys who are now stalking me on this board can't answer what's the difference to sexual assault severity if we all of a sudden stop considering 13-14 year olds children. But they know, they just won't answer. You remove the classification of the victim, you then can move on to decriminalizing the actual crime.

---
It's not the end of the world, but we can see it from here.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1