LogFAQs > #960052345

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, Database 9 ( 09.28.2021-02-17-2022 ), DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Rittenhouse for his gun charges dropped.
Esrac 11/16/21 12:19:07 PM #255:	limp-bizkit-89 posted... the precedent is someone can arm himself to the teeth and go to counter protest an event taking place (it could be a peaceful event, it could be a chaotic rally full of arsonists, it doesnt matter) and put himself in a position where he will be attacked by the mob there so he can shoot them without consequence. If you are attacked by the mob or a belligerent individual, shooting them is justified and you shouldn't face consequences for it. Especially if you tried to retreat first. That is a good precedent to set. The alternative you're implying is that you just let the mob beat you, possibly to death. <cite>Esrac posted [p:960052345] in Rittenhous... [t:79760795]...</cite> <quote>limp-bizkit-89 posted... </cite> <quote>the precedent is someone can arm himself to the teeth and go to counter protest an event taking place (it could be a peaceful event, it could be a chaotic rally full of arsonists, it doesnt matter) and put himself in a position where he will be attacked by the mob there so he can shoot them without consequence.</quote> If you are attacked by the mob or a belligerent individual, shooting them is justified and you shouldn't face consequences for it. Especially if you tried to retreat first. That is a good precedent to set. The alternative you're implying is that you just let the mob beat you, possibly to death. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1