whitelytning posted... No. That is the exact beauty of it.
It relies on people and places a burden on the state with a presumption of innocence because they want to avoid the unjust imprisonment or harms to innocent people. The state has fucked so much of this case up and the defense has done the absolute minimum. In this instance it may be someone you dont like that is benefiting from the safeguards but the safeguards are there for a reason and it shows the justice system does work.
The state shouldnt get a free pass because you have prejudged someone.
Safeguards are one part of the system. The safeguards might be working but the system is not.
... Copied to Clipboard!